Nature Journaling and Field Sketching

I liked drawing from the photo as I could take my time capturing as much detail as I could. I drew the large oval shapes of the bird first to make sure I had the proportions right and to make it a proper size to the paper.  I didn't notice the bird's shoulder or top-foreward part of it's wing until I was well into the drawing.  I think taking time to observe such details will benefit my journaling for sure!

1. It was challenging to figure out where to start and the proportions of the bird. I was using colored pencils, and the color came pretty naturally. However, there’s no detail in the feathers due to the nature of my coloring. 2. If I was just journaling without drawing, I don’t think I would’ve appreciated the subtle color difference in the warblers top and bottom beak or the way it’s wing feathers stack so perfectly.

It was a bit of a challenge.  I found myself having trouble slowing down to focus on the details.  Part of why I want to take this course is to be able to focus more on details. I had trouble drawing the head in particular and also getting it scale .

I enjoyed this exercise. Although it was scary to jump in with no instruction, it allowed me to think more about where I'm at right now, and how I'd like to approach the course. One of my goals is to improve my skills using Procreate on my iPad. This gave me the chance to try setting up what a page my nature journal might look like (taking inspiration from Jo Brown's "Secrets of a Devon Wood"). I can now keep this as a template, or try something new next time. Sketching the warbler gave me a chance to try new brushes. I got carried away trying to add color... Something that has been challenging for me is to let myself leave a piece incomplete. I had fun trying even more painting techniques and was happy with the progress, but decided to hide those layers for now and ultimately leave it as it is. In the past, I'd feel conflicted about this, but today it feels like the best choice. Looking forward to returning to this warbler friend at the end of the course!

1. I felt a little lost at first. 2. What came easy was just letting the pen flow as I saw the picture. The challenging part was letting go of the need to draw it perfectly. 3. I wouldn’t have noticed all the different colors of the branch and how the bird had faded areas of bright yellow and dark yellow. Yes, nature journaling would make a difference because you are asked to pay attention to the detail of an object.

It felt easier to draw from a photo rather than a bird such as a Yellow Warbler flitting around, not sitting still generally for me to get all the details right. I didn't draw all of the twig that the bird was sitting on. I would not have noticed the yellow/brown of the back of the head and leading into the wings.  That was harder to capture in my drawing btw.  I am not sure how much of a difference it would make in a field drawing but I will notice as I do one.

I often draw birds from photos, so that came easily. The challenge was to keep going once the bird was complete! Once I finish sketching a bird, I usually consider myself done - but having just outlined a bit of a goal about completeness on a page, I went ahead and sketched the branch with a few leaves and even the lichen - and better yet, made some descriptive notes about color and texture. I'm excited to see how my yellow warbler might be different at the end of my journal!

1. It was very relaxing drawing the photo. I found that it was easy for me to try to get shading into the image but it was difficult to get the initial shape right. 2. I definitely noticed small details from the photo, specifically coloring such as the branch being grey instead of a brown. I think this would make a difference when nature journaling if I have time to observe the subject as I draw, but I am worried about how long it took me and how that translates into nature drawing.

I am more likely to notice details when drawing that I would probably miss when just glancing at a photo. Like how the warbler's feet clutch the branch, and how the leaves have bites taken out of them. It's helpful to draw from a photo, though, because the subject is still. And a photo gives an accurate idea of color.

Drawing the warbler confirmed my lack of skills to draw what I see.  Starting with a blank page I found it challenging to know where to begin.  In the center with the bird and work out or sketch an outline of the whole photo and fill in?  Scale and proportions are essential but not sure to how draw that on paper.  Nothing came easily to me except for enjoying the yellow warbler but disappointed at how I misrepresented it.  There is definitely room to grow here!

This was a fun exercise. I think I will need to focus on getting more accurate proportions/shapes to start before I add details.  I didn't attempt any color yet but thought about using some colored pencils to suggest color notes.  The advantage to drawing from a photo is that there is plenty of time to do the drawing.

I always think my bird drawings look like the bird is smiling. I think that's odd and really not very accurate but still I like following the lines of the little bird. I noticed the streaking more as I took the time to look at him closely.

I felt that it was a little hard to make the picture as realistic as the real photo. I think the shape of the bird was a little challenging and drying the features inside the bird was extremely challenging. I might not have noticed how many streaks there were in the bird. Yes, it does make a difference when your journal it because you have to get all the details.

I used colored pencils as I’m doing this in my office. It ended up looking flat. I can spend more time on layering feather groups

I couldn’t quite get the eye the way I wanted it until I zoomed in a noticed this little ring of skin around the bird’s eyeball! Totally shifted how it looked to me by attempting to add that detail in my drawing. Feathers were difficult for me to capture… would be interesting to draw single feathers to get a sense of their structure.

I felt comfortable with sketching the basic shapes and outlines of the bird and branches. It was a challenge getting textures and fine details.

There is a little area around the eye from the eyelids that I would have missed if not sketching it.

24 Feb 2023 1. I like having the time to work on the proportions (a big challenge). The drawing became easy and fun once I was able to get over the "nervies". 3. The subtle title in the head and the turn of the body; still didn't get these down as well as I'd like. The Warbler was looking over its shoulder me and I'd like to be able to get these gestures and get away from the flat look.  This may be more difficult in nature journaling because of the time factor; and I'm still striving to catch the liveliness in nature.

I am no artist, but I have really enjoyed doing this. I noticed small details of the feathering and leaves. Can’t wait to start adding watercolour but have no idea how to do it! I find proportions the most tricky. But I am pleased with the outcome of my first task. 😊

Truly enjoyed seeing all the details. Also: what a difference it made to use the pencil recommended in the course; I've struggled to find a pencil I like to draw with, and this was great. The bird's feet were challenging for me -- proportions, angles. I did not realize how streaky the breast of the bird was until I started to draw it; or how very distinctive the different kinds of feathers are (nice to be able to zoom in to see the details) This is very much an advantage when learning about a bird.

Obviously I need to work on my photography skills again - took me longer to get the picture, research to remember how to adjust the lighting, and download it than it did to do the drawing. I am a good drawer, but my biggest problem is getting bogged down in details, and taking waaaaay too long to produce a picture. I am hoping this course helps me to 'loosen up' and create something in the same year I started it. I took a course through the Robert Bateman Foundation in Victoria and one thing that always resonated with me was the instructor talking about 'giving the illusion' of feathers, or fur, or whatever versus drawing every single excruciating detail. I try to keep that in mind. Also, my animal/bird feet are normally appalling but I am quite happy with this guy's feet. Another thing I do is when I want a loose, uneven line such as on a branch, I switch to my left hand and draw. Drawing with my right hand tends to produce smooth, unrealistic looking branches.

Getting the general shape of the bird was a challenge - as was making the feathers look like individual feathers.

1. I think it turned out well, but could be improved. The branches were fairly easy to draw, but the bird itself was more difficult. 2. A small twig of some sort was sticking out of a larger one that took a few seconds to notice.

I have to say, I would have liked some instruction here. I opted not to mess up my drawing with watercolour at this stage, as I can't remember what colours to lay on or how to lay them on (i.e, what brushes to use). As a companion to this course, I am reading a book I purchased that was recommended in another Cornell course I took - The Sierra Club Guide to Sketching in Nature. The section on brushes was particularly interesting. I tend to draw very slowly, plus as ranchers the day is continually interrupted so I'm moving ahead on the course while I complete this drawing.

I just began a class through Cornell Labs on drawing birds.  I am learning about the various feather groups in that course and found it interesting to note those in drawing the Yellow Warbler.  I did try to use watercolors on this picture but feel instead of enhancing the bird, the colors, especially in the flank of the bird, did not show the accurate coloring of the bird.

Drawing the yellow warbler from the photo was a challenge for me.  I wasn’t sure where to begin.   I thought with the bird, but found myself focusing on the branch and foliage.  Had difficulty with sizing spacing on my page. Tried painting, but think layering colors is needed and figuring out what colors to mix to get desired hues.  Drawing from photo was easy as the subject stayed in one place. The colors of the stems leading to the leaves would not have been notice without drawing it. Details are key to drawing I think.

I think drawing from the photo is easier than being out of nature. You are able to see all the details. I think using the watercolors made it easier to get finish the picture in a fair amount of time. The details of the branch was challenging for me and also those details I would have missed if I just looked at the image rather drawing/painting it. I think that's the point of nature journaling is to see the details. Notice the moss growing, the leave being green, the bird rather plump compared to the ones I see on their migration that are thin from the journey, the background swathed in green. Someone mentioned below that they had a hard time with the beak. I did too. I think the head loos more like a yellow platypus rather than a yellow warbler. I also left no room for words, but I suppose I can write over the paint.

1.  I enjoyed drawing the Warbler! I like focusing on the details of the bird while doing this process. The broader outlines weren't too difficult for me, but proportion of parts and placement were harder. 2.  I noticed more of the bird's shading while drawing it, and placement of the feathers, as well as the setting details. For journaling, I'd note the additional colors/shading for better identification. Also, the location of the bird is helpful for identification (tree, water, ground)

I have a long way to go.

I tried to remember the advice from the video about finding shapes in the bird's body. It took time, and there are still parts that I don't think I captured well (the breast region and the legs in particular), but I ended up being pretty happy with it. The tail was really challenging as was capturing the details of the feathers and markings. I found that the longer I spent on looking and revisiting, the more realistic my sketch got. I also found myself wondering how much time I should spend on the branch and leaves. I did notice some details about the leaves (serrated edges, alternating pattern) that I wouldn't have noticed if I hadn't have been looking so closely.

• Drawing in general is challenging for me.  It took a few hours to sketch the warbler and then try watercolor pencils. I can’t say anything came easily, but I enjoyed the process.  Having time to observe a photo is a plus.  Drawing offered me a better understanding of the bird’s coloring, the shape of it’s beak, and legs.  Certainly appreciate the opportunity to be more observant through nature journaling.

This was hard for me. At least in the photo the bird is standing still. I can't imagine trying to get all the details from looking at a moving creature. I tried using water color pencils, but the colors still need work.

I mostly enjoyed taking my time and doing the watercolors in layers, but sometimes it was hard to be patient. Ultimately it was quite satisfying to see the realism of the bird appear towards the end. I definitely noticed the subtle differences between colors.

1. It was a little intimidating to just do it without any instruction, but I got more confident as I went. It was good to start with something that doesn't move because it took a long time! 2. There we lots of details like leg position, beak shape, locations of colors, etc... that I would not have really processed if I didn't have to draw it. This will make a big difference when trying to ID an animal. Lots of times I read a description of a species when trying to ID a bird and realize that I have no idea if there was a ring around the eye, what shape the tail was, where the banding was located. I'm hoping to learn to notice these details better!

Drawing from a photo was low-key and no pressure.  Everything was challenging for me! but especially proportions.  Drawing forces me to slow down and look.  What are the angles of the legs to the body? The colours of the chest markings?  Where were the shadows and how do I depict them?  I think nature journalling is all about seeing and caring about the details .

1. I felt comfortable drawing from a photo, using the idea of shapes as a guide to get me started.  It helped me to see where & how correct or off my idea of the bird's size was. It is also far easier to draw something that isn't moving or changing.  The light doesn't change either. 2. The warbler's legs, their slant, the claw curls, would be very hard to distinguish in nature drawing, also the detail of the beak.  Particularly with warblers, movement is always such an issue with observation; they're always flitting, rarely indulging us with log-term poses. The movement would also be an issue as far as shadows hiding bird shape, wing shape & length. I haven't tried yet, but I think trying to draw birds in my nature journal will be a huge challenge.  Another aspect is whether it's a clear or cloudy day.  Overcast skies change observation of any bird's coloring. I'm hoping this class will teach me how work with all of the above mentioned!

Drawing from the photo gave me time to work on the details of flight feathers, branch, twigs and leaves. The challenge was drawing what I see rather than what I expected. For instance the light and dark of the leaves, twigs and feathers. The bird in the photo has the head turned slightly toward the viewer. I drew it more one dimensionally.

Drawing brings you way deep into the detail. I noticed things like the detail of the lichen around the branch, the unexpected angles of the bird's legs and talons, and the lines and shading of the feathers. Drawing what you actually see (vs. what you think should be there) is a real challenge - it's tough to get the lines and proportions right!

I started with the branch - that felt easy! Then I worked my way from the bird's tiny toes and legs to its body. Getting the shape of the body was difficult. The legs look funny even though I thought I had drawn them easily! Size and proportions of the bird to the twig are off! I was intent on the patterns and color of the feathers while coloring the bird. This seemed to be something I noticed more carefully since I was drawing/coloring it.

It felt pretty good.  The beak and the position of the bird's head was especially challenging.  I may not have noticed the light brown on the bird's chest, or the blackness of the eye.  It looked better when I erased the pencil sketch marks around the bird.

How do I feel about drawing from a photo?  Not rushed.  Liked how details started to appear. Was there anything in the photo that you might not have noticed if you weren’t asked to draw it? The contours of the bird's body, the different types of feathers, the ring around the eye, and the nostril opening on the top of the beak.  And, those claws! Would this make a difference when nature journaling? Yes - for sure!  

The feeling of drawing was really thrilling. Was initially reluctant about the finish of the bird image. It was my first attempt at bird drawing without using an eraser. That itself was very satisfying. Branches and the leaves were easy to draw. The challenging part was the finer details of the branches and the colour composition observed in the photo. Yes, maybe the white fungus part of the branches, the stubs, and dried leaves, and also the finer details of babbler feathers.

the longer you look at something the more you see...the warbler's chest feathers are brownish red! I never would have noticed that without looking at the picture for a long time.

I really liked this exercise.  I just started and learned as I went. And I was surprised how well it turned out.  I am a long time birder, so I have a pretty good 'feel' for the shape of particular bird species. That really helped. The hardest part was the wings:  getting the flow of the feathers right and getting the shading right to show contrasting patterns. The head was easiest because of the consistent colouring. Drawing this bird helped me see the different textures and colours of the bird's body. I will look more carefully at a real bird now!  

I'm waiting for instruction on use of colors. I have little talent in drawing, painting, etc., but have taught video production. I stayed with pencil and noted details. My focus is in field marks and interesting details like the lack of a clench on the left foot. This will help in journaling. 

I didn't use watercolor because I had color pencils right in front of me and I'd procrastinated getting started. I think the drawing came out okay,  although it looks a little stiff and flat. Couldn't get the feeling of roundness of the bird or the fluff of chest and upper back feathers. It was a bit of a challenge to draw the bird from a photo. I wonder how I would get moving objects to be recognizable if sketching from real life?  

• I thought it was fun to dive in. I liked working on the proportions. It was a little hard to get the detail and to have a crisp image. For instance, the highlight in the pupil for was difficult because I’d mark over it. I like how the bird claws cling to the branch by wrapping around it similar to how a person grasps. I didn’t notice that before I started trying to draw.  It was a little difficult to figure out the feather structure and how to depict it and also how to show the softness of the feather fluff obscuring the leg but to still show how straight the leg was.I used color pencils because I don’t yet know how to use the water brush and pocket field sketch box.

This was difficult for the first time drawing My bird looks lopsided, I cannot get the scale right, or an accurate representation of the feathers. By drawing it I did notice more detail both in the bird and the habitat -- how the bird's feathers have different layers, the interesting patterns and colors of the lichen on the branch for example.

I like detail but have a terrible memory so love photos.  I can also reflect on what I did see and not just try to remember it.  I was drawn to the colors more due to the greyish background and was interested in everything my eye could take in.  The Lichen and type of holly tree all made me curious.  I worry I may not do well in nature with just my eye and memory to catch the true subjects.  I tend to question what plants are around me, tree, flowers or weeds so I think I can see those as well as the bird or creature and learn about them too.

I don’t have my watercolors yet, so I used pencils.  Drawing from the photo really allowed me to see all of the details in how each feather was arranged and how the sum of the parts made up the complete bird.  It seems almost impossible to capture!

I haven't used water colors before.  I just received my supplies for this class and this is my first attempt to use water colors and a water brush.  I found it difficult to control the paint.  The colors turned muddy.  I have used acrylics before, just whimsical paintings.  I found getting the proportions correct was difficult.  The tail is too long and I couldn't figure out how to get the head cocked to the side.  I am looking forward on learning how to draw from life and expanding my skills.

May thought that it was scary to draw a new thing with no instructions but then realized she did it all the time and got the hang of it. I also thought it was a little scary but when I got started I realized it wasn't so bad. For May everything accept the toes and legs. I thought that most of it was challenging but when I got to the wing it got easy. When May looked at the picture after she had drawn it she hadn't seen the mushrooms at the edge of the picture but she had drawn it. I didn't notice the little patch of  yellow vines at the edge of the branch the bird was standing on. But I did draw it on my pad. But we think that it matters because we would want to catch every little detail. And I think it's fun just jumping into the drawing without thinking about it. Thank you, May & Margot

I enjoyed drawing the little warbler.  I found the beak really hard to draw.  Struggled getting the proportions right. The item I may not have noticed in the photo, that I noticed when I drew the warbler was the black on the feathers in the wings.  The red streaks on the breast of the bird have always jumped out at me when I've seen them in pictures and in the wild but I never really noticed the black on the wing feathers.  I used colored pencils and next time I may try water color.  I've never used them before but just picked up some watercolor pens.  Wish me luck! :)  

Felt pretty okay getting shapes sketched out, but trying out the watercolors really threw me. Tough to get the right colors mixed!

Very quick sketch with pencil and colored pencils, in keeping the spirit of the course!  I usually put more time and effort and pull out the watercolors but really doesn't come out that much better.   I wish I could draw/paint thin fine lines which are needed for the feathers.  Overall happy with my little yellow warbler!

1.  It’s been quite a while since I drew anything, and I have never been any good.  It was better than I expected, but still pretty kindergarten like. 2.  The way the Yellow Warbler’s feet appear on the branch.  Yes.

Drawing from the photo is easier than from the field, I suppose.  Still, challenging is drawing the feather details.  I might have missed the color of the feet, and the breast pattern as more streaked than stripes.  Certainly, drawing makes me more focused on the particular details and field marks. It helps me remember them better, but also it is sometimes easier to depict than describe.

We have lots of warblers where I live, but I have never drawn one before. Overall, kind of challenging because I don’t draw often. But I really loved getting to notice all the minor details.

I was challenging to get the size and proportions correct, even from a photo. Drawing it helped me notice the shape and feather patterns.

The practice sketch was fun! I enjoyed practicing the feet, something I wouldn’t have tried without the photo. I can see the benefit of using photos in the field if you want to capture details you can’t really see well in the field- like warbler’s feet. On the other hand, they may be a distraction from being in the moment with what’s in front of you. 

Starting with basic shapes and framing helped in the drawing. Interested to see how next attempt has improved.

I've never seen a Yellow Warbler in person (that I know of).  Now that I've drawn one, I'm much more likely to recognize one in the future.  Drawing from a photo can be great since you can hone in and focus on details (since the subject isn't moving)--and you can choose to highlight details that catch your eye and let others fade or draw them with less detail.

Drawing from a photo gave me time to look at details and have the proportions and shapes drawn as accurate as possible; however, the challenging part was trying to illustrate actions (e.g. the feet of the yellow warbler perching on the branch, what was the bird intended behavior, etc).  I did not apply water colors.  If I were capturing a yellow warbler when nature journaling, I would have probably failed to notice the contrast in the wing bars and how many bars they have.

Very hard to get the proportions right. Doesn't look anything like a warbler! But let's keep trying!

😂 I think I will look for a pencil eraser with a brush at one end. I've worn down the eraser on my Pentel a bit and see it will get more action as time goes on. Also, I will mark the time so I can see how much time is spent on sketches.

I didn´t quite know what part to start drawing first, the bird or the tree and if I would get the scale right. I was surprised how hard it was to concentrate on the little details on the tree. I may not have noticed exactly how the claws grasp onto the tree and the line of the tail and how many little details there are on the tree. I think this first exercise will make a difference for me because I think I should draw what I most want to draw first and then fill in the other details.

My colors look muddy, proportions off, I liked my drawing more, my watercolor skill disappointed me.

Well, it looks more like a yellow bird than I thought it would.  I noticed lots of people use the trick of re-doing several variations of a line, rather than get the perfect line the first try.  t looks fine like that, I am going to try to do that.

Some benefit(s)/easiest parts include not having your subject move and being allowed more time than if in nature. It is challenging to draw from a flat 2D photo b/c it is a representation of reality. I noticed all sorts of details about the position and shape of the bird and tree branch as I tried to accurately represent them in my drawing, rather than just glancing at a photo and moving on. This would certainly make a difference when journaling.

Kaia's mom Angela

Kaia age 11

I enjoyed drawing from the photo because the subject wasn't moving and it's easier to pick up details and shapes.  I thought seeing the shapes were easy, trying to figure out the light source direction and shading was a bit tricky for me.  I have never seen a yellow warbler, so drawing it will help me remember it if I ever see one.

Argh! Almost finished with my response then lost the page. Rather than repeat everything, I'll go right to what I noticed because this was a photo: The different shapes and textures of the feathers, and that one foot was not fully grasping the branch. Yes, this would be the questions I would be asking ... and perhaps with a bird in front of me, I'd get the answer through patient observation. And now that I found the edit button, I will add that I took your bird painting class a few months ago (waxwing) and learned about feather structures then!

Drawing the bird was easy from the photo.  It was not jumping around!  Capturing the background and environment is difficult.

Johana 6 years :-)

Considering that birds are almost always in motion I often reach for a camera before the binoculars so I can snap a pic then zoom in, look at specific markings, beak shape and color etc. otherwise it's just the flash of a yellow bird in the bush,  blink and it's gone.  The idea of drawing  from life is terrifying, unless maybe it's a heron!  Drawing it made me look closer at its grasp of the twig. the eye etc.  Feathers and markings are still really intimidating!

First bird  I've ever drawn like this!  I saw more colors than I expected to, and I noticed the shading of the wing, the shoulder and the back of hte head/neck.  The yellow also has different intensities, but I'm not sure how to show that.

For me drawing from the photo allowed me to take my time, I could breathe and try to relax as I drew the bird.  It was a nice challenge; I can only get better from here 😊.  Using a photo allowed me to come back and take a layered approach, first get the basic outline, and then start adding details.  If I didn’t have the photo, I wouldn’t have noticed the upside down ‘v’ over the beak, the yellow ring around the eye.  I think when drawing a live bird, I'll initially have to focus on the primary details quickly and not worry so much about the details, things like focus on the head to body ratio, what type of beak, beak-eye to head ratio (is it a downy or a hairy woodpecker?), how long is the tail.

I found this exercise so enjoyable. Drawing the photo helped me notice tiny details I would not have otherwise.  Who was munching on that leaf? Did the warbler find a tasty caterpillar on the tree? What kind of tree is this? Drawing also highlighted the incredible variation of yellows, browns and black.  It was quite a challenge to depict with a pencil! Photographs convey dimension so clearly. I am looking forward to improving drawing 3D objects and scenes as currently my drawings tend to appear quite flat.

It's easier than drawing in real life. I can take my time observing the bird before sketching it. The most challenging part was drawing the details on it's wings, but the overall figure, face, and beak was the easiest to draw. 

Drawing from a photo certainly is a lot easier than trying to catch a glimpse of a bird in nature. The advantage of a photo is that it objectively provides details of the bird which are so important in identification.  The photo is more accurate to some extent but that can change depending upon the lighting and angle of the bird, whether it is fluffed up to keep warm etc. Drawing made me pay more attention to the shape and details.

I was determined not to be afraid or intimidated, but to just "Jump right in!". Knowing where to start was a challenge, it was easier to get some detail once I got the main outline of the branches and the bird. I probably wouldn't have noticed all the different smooth and fluffy feathers, as well as all the details on the branches had I not been drawing. Would this make a difference when journaling? I suppose so, if the goal is really learn and observe what you are drawing. It allows time to ponder, leading to questions, then hopefully some answers!

The beak and the eye were the "easiest" for me, but the contouring of the feathers was difficult. The more I looked and drew, the more I noticed. For example, the ring around the eye and the detail of the beak, and the way the claws wrapped around the branch. The nature journaling process needs to be one where you can take your time, and relax and focus on the subject. 

Had I not been drawing I most likely would not have noticed the details of the branch that the warbler was perched on. The branch had so many details with the lichens, moss, leaves and the overall texture of the branch. This is not to take away from the beauty of the bird. The bird was definitely center stage.

I observe more when drawing. I saw colors and gradations that I would have missed

I had a hard time deciding whether to focus on textures (individual wing and covert feathers, fluffiness of breast feathers) or focus on color differences (bright yellow versus slightly more muted yellow versus black on the wings). Tried to get the shape right by starting with circles for the head and the body...definitely think I got closer than if I'd free-handed it, but still room for improvement!

My pencil drawing seemed inadequate, given the lovely colours and textures in this photo. I realised I could enlarge the photo on my screen, so I guess that is quite an advantage over drawing something in the field. Great to see the other drawings and comments, a great first exercise!

It felt a bit off, like I was missing a support structure. I felt like starting came easily, but continuing past that point was really difficult. I don't feel like I noticed anything diffrent this time around. It would probably be a major different while journalling though, as you have less time to examine what you are looking at.

Thoughts about photos vs drawings: photos are kind of static, whereas a drawing is always a work in progress because is represents so many decisions, changes, alterations, and hints and so many that could still be made. A photo, and reality of course, contain myriad details that a drawing could infinitely explore.

Some really good illustrations submitted, I was not going to paint it however having looked at some of the other I will have a go. not confident with water colours, give it a try.  

Since the subject is still, I can pay more attention to details.

I felt pretty good about my first attempt, tried to get to scale right on the bird

For me, two things about sketching from a photograph stand out. First, with the picture right there I keep seeing things I want to fix, I had to give myself a timer or else I'd spend hours trying to get it "perfect". Secondly, no songbird I've seen would stay still for 15 minutes!

It was definitely difficult especially since I was trying to do it fairly quickly as if I were drawing a real warbler in the field and it might fly away at any moment.

I was very critical of my work - but it was wonderful to have time to think about proportions and angles.  I also paid quite a bit of attention to the markings, even if those didn't necessarily translate to my sketch. I haven't done much drawing from life - it's usually been from photographs, but I was thinking all the while how this might be quite different if the bird were moving about. Or if it just alit, then flew away!

1. I almost feel like drawing from a photo is more annoying because I feel like I have to get everything down. If I were drawing this bird from life I wouldn't have the time to think about exactly what angle each part is at, I would just have to get something down as best I could. There also might be behavioral activity that would make watching them way more interesting. 2. Because I was drawing from the photo, I did notice how the leg connects to the body in that you can see and infer where the joints go based on how their body is positioned.

I was surprised that the more I drew the more details I started to notice in the bird photo that I hadn't really paid attention to when I first looked at it. Trying to figure out where everything would be in the drawing made me notice more details of different feather groups, the little scaly legs and how the beak was shaped.

Drawing from a photo is technally easier because nothing moves.  Plenty of time to look, draw, erase, redraw.

I was surprised how focusing on the details changed what I saw. Shapes and striations I would have never noticed. Also little things like the toes of one foot were not wrapped around the branch. Also placement of the eye relative to the beak. So interesting to see what I miss by not paying attention to the destabilize.  

Drawing from the photo makes us observe all the ways the feathers interact, their various colors and textures.  You look at those skinny legs and how they grab the twig.  You see all the different colors of lichens.

Pretty 👍

Drawing from the photo, I felt that I had time enough to capture the bird morphology, plumage, and body proportions. To sketch the whole body in proportion was easy with the photo as reference, trying to emphasize details like the number of primary and secondary wing feathers was challenging. Yes, I did not notice before that the ventral stripes of this yellow warbler were of a different color (brown) than the stripes on the rest of its body (black). It makes a difference depending on the goal of this particular entry, to document just the presence of the bird, or to make a study towards a correct illustration.

It was hard to be confident that I could do this! Realize I need a good eraser,,, thought about shapes I saw like the other person said they did. Was happy with this try

Since the picture was clear, it was easier to draw looking at it as reference. However, I was having a little trouble with sizing and shading, as you can see there is minimal shading in my drawing. The bird came quite easily, I was having trouble with the tree branches and leaves. And the claws of the bird. I may not have noticed the brown markings on the belly of the bird if i hadn't been asked to draw it. Yes I think it would be far harder to get these details when drawing outdoors. Also, to get size positioning, negative spaces shading etc. 

It was fun creating some kind of likeness of the bird in the drawing.  It is an impression rather than a reproduction. I didn't feel confident about the drawing or the painting, in fact it is one of my first times trying watercolours and I had trouble mixing the media and confidently applying it. I am not very happy with my colours.  I also didn't feel confident about "owning" my journal page.  At first it was an empty sheet and then I put the image on it .... and then, "what will I write and where???" Regarding looking at the photo and seeing things I may not have otherwise noticed, yes and no.  I did see what was in the photo as I would have used the details for ID, however i certainly took more notice of the detail of what was there and that has re-inforced those features in my mind.  These details might be useful as notes to make at the side of drawing as I will never be able to quickly capture such details in a watercolour - not as far as I can imagine anyway!  

1. Drawing from a photo is my usual method, I tend to trace details when i cant get them right, so this was a good exercise for my minds eye. I feel the perspective is a little off, i had a difficult time positioning the head and getting the body length correct. 2. The texture and variation in the leaves and branches, i tend to draw leaves at the same angles and taper branches more than necessary

  Watercolor is unpredictable and difficult to correct.  The colors didn't transfer faithfully to the jpeg. One challenge was to put the eye in the right spot on the side of the head.  It was helpful to try to visualize the bones that underlie the masses.  The more I looked, the more I saw and it took way to long to do this exercise.  I anticipate the I'll have difficulty catching the moment when in a natural setting.

Drawing from an image allows more time to focus and add details; however, it also grants the viewer the time to dwell on aspects you may have overlooked in nature, which can be a blessing and a curse. For instance, a photo allows the opportunity and time to complete the drawing without disruption but also introduces the ability to erase and become critical of your journaling. 

I did okay for my first attempt. The eye is a bit too big. I could see the angles and the shapes, but it is more challenging to replicate. The shading and the coloring is challenging in just a pencil drawing. I noticed how the moss is similar in color to the warbler. Drawings can capture the minute details. Photographs can show clearly the intense colors.

I prefer to draw from a drawing because it shows me how the artist interpreted the image and I am better at copying other drawings. I see that the eye is too big and that a yellow warbler is smaller and rounder than I depicted. My painting skills will hopefully improve over time... I used Sibley's to copy the notes on the page. I want to learn as much as I can about birds.

I’m used to drawing from photos, but I would prefer to draw in situ.  Getting the perspective on the branch was difficult.  I wouldn’t have noticed the subtleties of the coloring on the warbler, especially on his head & around his eye.  I would think the more I notice the better my drawing/painting will be.

I like the stability and clarity of the photo, though I'd rather be outside with this little guy. I noticed colors and feather shapes I would not have without drawing it. I'm definitely here to draw and not take photos-- though I'll keep doing that, too!

I noticed things that I never had about Yellow Warblers, particularly how much black is in the wing. I tried not to do a lot of erasing, but I obviously need to!

This was a fun assignment! I haven't used watercolors since high school art, and let's just say that was more than a few years ago. Nothing really came easily for me - I had to work for every stroke and every color. I haven't drawn a bird to this detail before, and over the years I've preferred writing to drawing, so this is a good stretch for me. I did this drawing twice, once with just pencil and then again with pencil, watercolors and marker. I was really intrigued by the feet holding on to the branch, and interestingly I did a much better job with them in the first pencil drawing. I might not have had the time to appreciate the feet holding the branch if I was trying to quickly capture this bird in the field. 

It was pretty easy. I've been drawing for quite a while using photos and other drawings as a reference point. The overall shape was fine but the beak and the correct angle on the head was kind of hard for me.  I probably wouldn't have noticed the turns and curves of the branch and would have tended to make it more streamlined. This would make drawing from nature look not quite as realistic so yes, I have to work on that! 

The joy of having a photo is being able to take time looking, colour matching, getting as much detail down as possible. It was only after finishing that I realized I had missed the upper part of the wing, so when I paint this again, I will hopefully remember! It was nice to try out watercolours and the water-reservoir brush; I can appreciate how handing this little kit is for taking out in the field. I might not have noticed the brown striations or streaks on the belly and how that brown carries on up to just under the beak on the throat if I hadn't been asked to draw it. Those sorts of details would definitely make a difference when nature journaling.

Drawing from the photo is good for me, as a beginner, because I have so much time to look and capture everything I watn to. I feel challenged by the proportions of the bird, I think is one of the most difficult things to do, I had to re-do the bill several times. Drawing from a photo makes me focus more on the details, I think is a great way lo learn more about birds.

1. I am a beginner and super detail-oriented. Drawing from a photo helps me to see details I would miss if the bird was moving outdoors. On the website there is a game to test your knowledge of bird anatomy.  I found that my brief exploration improved drawing the bird in proper proportion, relatively speaking. I wish I knew how to better illustrate the fluffy/downy feathers from say, tail feathers.

Drawing from the photo felt easier than trying to sketch a bird in the field. There is the luxury of everything sitting still. Using colour - in this case watercolour - is new to me, so I find it challenging and I hope to improve this. I want to learn how to use the colours for reference without losing details that my pencil and pen create. I might have overlooked the feather groupings and the colour of the legs as well as the shape of the leaves if I had not stopped to draw it. -Laurna, Toronto Canada

Comfortable.  I have done drawings before and pencil is my favorite.  Pretty much all of it was pretty easy.  I took the course to learn some new things I hope.  I do birding with friends for some years now.  Drawing will help me remember them better.  The bird likes berries so my guess is that it is in a berry type bush or a birch tree of some sort by the leaves. Paper makes a big difference in what you want to do.  Nature is one of my favorite things to watch.  I learned that the color of beaks and legs also help identify the bird in some cases. 

Getting the dimensions/proportions and details were challenging. But taking note of the warbler's position in relation to the leaves and the branches helped a lot. Through a photo, I noticed more of the details and the richness of the colors that I likely wouldn't have picked up from a drawing. I suspect I'll need to take photos first when I begin field sketching. My eyesight is not great and I feel like I'd miss a lot of the birds' details along with their environment.

Drawing really made me look at the details. It imprinted them in a way that the photograph did not. The drawing tests my patience. The photo is instant gratification.

The advantages of the photos over the drawings and vice versa? The photograph has great detail and color information that a drawing done on a smaller format using only graphite lacks. Nevertheless it makes the subject look flat. Although the photograph is focused on the bird a draftsperson has more control over which part of the picture he can add detail to as well as what to omit. 1. I felt comfortable drawing from the photograph because the subject wasn’t moving. Getting the proportions and the main pose of the bird was easy, however it was difficult to capture all the detail that I saw in the photograph. I think I should have drawn the bird at least twice as big. Also it was a challenge to capture the brightness of the bird's feathers. I think I would have been more comfortable had I been working on toned paper or if I had added a tone to the entire background (the photograph background is a medium tone and green in contrast to the yellow of the bird so that it really stands out). 2. Drawing from this photograph made me observe each part of the bird for a longer period of time than I would have just casually looking at it. This allowed me to notice the detail of the feathers around the eyes, the subtle color difference between the birds above and below feathers and the peculiar shape of the top part of the beak. I think that observing the subject for longer periods of time certainly makes a difference and it would do so in nature journaling as well.

1) A bit nervous, but tried tom look closely and draw what I see.  Once I looked at how the bird is located on the branch and how the different body parts are in relation to each other it was a bit easier to get the dimensions.  Found it difficult to get the lichen and the shading on the leaves.   2) Probably wouldn't have noticed the fringed feathers, and the different shadings - just see more of the whole and register that without looking specifically at each part.  Yes I think it is easy to just register the image rather than looking at how all the subparts of the image are in relation to each other and how they overlap - it is more likely that a phot is seen as one or two dimensional.

This was interesting. I have always been intimidated about drawing birds. I realize now that careful observations will help me improve. I did love having a subject that didn't jump around.  I will need to improve my computer skills, however. Taking the photo was the most challenging part.

This was a very fun exercise.  I'm new to drawing so the most difficult aspects of this are getting the proportions right as well as learning how to show shadows and negative space.  But I'm overall pleased with this drawing.  I'm impressed at how some people can whip their drawings together in just a few minutes!  This took me over an hour.  It's so easy to get lost in time when drawing.

I enjoyed drawing from the photo. However, I've always been better at drawing inanimate objects.  :)  I want to get more life into my drawings, eyes are my nemesis. I believe that becoming intimate with your subject always draws your attention to the finer details.   I've included my lowly attempt.  :)  

I'm so used to my subjects moving so fast when I am sketching birds. It was nice to draw from a photo! I feel like I may have made it more wooden feeling, though, because there was no movement to capture. But I was able to see details I wouldn't otherwise have been able to see. The stripes on the bird's breast I probably wouldn't have seen if it were in real life. I did a very quick sketch, in ink, because that's how I usually sketch when I am nature journaling. The hardest part for me was judging my work. I am not very talented or good at drawing.

Loved the exercise. The photo made it easy to observe, sketch, observe, sketch, observe some more and sketched and then try to get the main colours right. In nature the little fellow would have been long gone before I even finished typing these three sentences. The annotations made me think more about the details as well, notably the difference between the  finer dark grey stripping on wings compared to orangish brown coarse stripping on lower body.  Tried to complete my sketch in under 5 minutes since figured that would be well in excess of what a real nature venue would allow. Will have to try water colour paints... the colouring pencils were not capturing the shades or hues very well. Great sketches by all the other participants... congratulations to everyone. Not ready to share my attempt yet, my grandkids may see them and may be merciless in their critique.

It's a little bit hard to depict the feather of this bird but I think the part of general outline is OK. There are much more layers of birds' feather on their wings and that's a difficulty for me to draw them.

A little intimidating. More comfortable starting with the branches. A bit of a struggle to get the bird’s ratio and perspective correct.  The fine feathering structure was more varied than I realized and fell there will be a rather larger learning curve to get it accurately.  

I enjoyed this… it was a good feeling to “jump in.” It helped to format my drawing area to approximate the dimensions of the image on my iPad screen. Then, blocking in the branches provided a foundation for me to have some success with my goal of placing the warbler in relative size with its surroundings. Drawing from a photo is great! Everything is locked in place. Drawing most definitely inspired me to look closely at details and their relationships with each other. I am an amateur photo-naturalist and believe this skill (photo to drawing) will greatly enhance my observation skills and understanding of Nature’s intricacies. It seemed logical to begin labeling and jotting down questions.

I’m so rusty with drawing that I felt a little intimidated. 1. I feel like my proportions are off with the bird. It will be interesting to see if there are improvements over the course of time. Drawing from a photo is a bit easier for things like birds and animals since they are captured in the moment, and for seeing some detail. The challenge is the lighting made it a little difficult to see the detail of leaves on the tree, but I also just roughed those in. 2. I probably wouldn’t have noticed the nuanced coloring on the head and wings. 3. Making notations of those differences and nuances might trigger my memory when doing field sketches.

My first pencildrawing of the yellow bird. I am going to color it with colorpencils. Can't decide wether to go over it with a black pen first. I know that will give the drawing a harder impression than if I dont. And I dont nessecarily want that. On the other hand I will be more in control of the drawing.  /Eva

Trying to the get proportions on the beak just right really made me look at the shape of the beak. A detail I wouldn't have thought about while taking a photo. Drawing lets me pick what stands out to me.

Liz didn’t say to paint, only to draw — so that’s exactly what I did. I worked quickly and tried to capture some dimension in B&W. 1. I loved drawing from the photo … it helped see details & proportions more easily. The feathers individually were challenging - so I just blocked them in -  and the basic shape was fairly easy. 2. The little circle around the eye is never seen unless I draw a bird. The nuanced feathers and markings would not be noticed in detail except for drawing. The beak is very different when drawing from photos than seeing on the wing. All those details would slow me down and possibly cause me to ask WHY/purpose  (form follows function) questions in my journal.

1. Drawing the basic shape of the bird was easy, but adding the details of feathers/shading was more difficult. Drawing from the photo was much easier than drawing in person, since the bird doesn't move or leave. But it was difficult to make the bird look "alive" since it's so static in the photo.   2. I wouldn't have noticed the minor color differences or how the talons curled around the branch without the photo. I would have been too focused on trying to draw the shape and get the base colors for the bird before it left. With creatures, I would have to draw quickly to catch them, which may leave me without the chance to study them closely. With plants and landscapes I should be able to slow down and get the minor details.  

I'm usually more comfortable drawing from a photo than from real life or memory, probably because the photo allows me lots of time and something 2-D to work from. I only saw all of the beautiful coloured birds posted by others after I had finished mine (and my son his). My 11-year-old son thinks that drawing is more fun than photography and can be more impressive.

when you love to draw and enjoy it, all the sensations are really satisfactory and gratifying, was not exactly dificult because usually i make drawings taking a photo as reference, but using few colours with pencils, ballpens and maker pens, so with this course, i hope to learn and test new techniques and materials as watercolor and improve it, more specific i think to emphasize some details in a few brushstrokes,  influencing of course, in a more sensitive final result too.

1. It felt intimidating in one sense to try to draw that beautiful bird from such an expert photo. What came easily was the basic bird shape inside the brain already but trying to actually translate what was being seen in the photo to the paper was challenging. The finer details of the feather lines and the fluffy feathers along the tops of the legs and the exact sillouette was challenging. 2. Yes, I would not have noticed the finer details of the feather lines and the fluffy feathers along the tops of the legs and the exact sillouette if I had not been asked to draw it. Yes, it will make a difference in nature journaling, to take something that you observe and notice and ensure you capture it in the journal (but it would not have to be excat replication, you could add a note about what that part of your drawing was meant to show).

I got very happily involved in this activity! I can get really precious with my drawings and overwork them, and was stymied at first putting down the first few marks & reworking proportions.  I work from photos I've taken frequently because I draw slowly. When out hiking, I usually just take a few notes & then photograph or do a scribbly minimal sketch. Here I decided to play with a mix of pen, watercolor pencil and brush, and pencil. Messing about with media where I'm less comfortable ended up being really satisfying. I know I didn't get the feathers as exact as a photograph, but I don't mind--as long as the significant markers are accurately depicted. (Plus I'm not sure I would ever have the patience.) I did like thinking through how to create an impression of the different textures of the feathers and lichens/mosses and how they moved. Without the photo I certainly wouldn't have picked up on the depth of detail.  I do find that I remember more about my observations when I draw and write.

When I draw the birds I feel like I remember them better. I. Enjoy the drawing....but wish I was better at it! Promotion is tough....and the legs and feet are impossible haha!

1)I liked drawing from the photo because the bird didn’t fly away or flit around…no wind, lol. Trying to get correct proportions and angles was difficult. I found that I was able to see more detail in the beginning then tapered off toward the end of drawing. 2)I may not have noticed the texture of the birds feathers. The details like the lichen on the branches and the length of the claws help make the drawing realistic.

I felt ok drawing from the photo. I've done that many times before. I'm not sure if I've drawn a bird before, though! What I do know is that I didn't get the proportions where I wanted them to be, but I didn't spend much time on this. Still, I feel that if I was drawing out in the field, I would have spent even less time on it. Getting the colors where I wanted them to be was fairly easy. What was difficult was determining what details I wanted to keep in. It's difficult to get the fine striping on the wings done with the brush I had (the water brush that came with the Koi field watercolor set). This really got me thinking about the different types of feathers and textures on a bird. Is this important in nature journaling? Maybe, and I suppose that depends on the purpose of the journaling. Photos have advantages over drawings in that they can show the different textures very well. Being able to show different textures in drawing or painting media takes practice. Pictures can also be created in an instant. However, drawings can show more depth. They can also represent what colors you see in the field; sometimes cameras can be very finicky and they won't pick up on the colors you actually see.

1: I felt nervous as I have never felt I had any talent for art. This is my first ever attempt at drawing a bird. Getting the general shape was fairly easy.  Getting the color right and drawing the beak was challenging. 2: The Lichen on the tree branch, two types I think.  Also the fine brown striping on the breast of the warbler was more obvious when I was trying to draw it.  When nature journaling I will need to train myself to be more observant of details.

I found it hard to make a bird look like it has feathers. I also found that I'd like to get a finer tipped paintbrush to allow for better details. I was surprised that I could get the texture of the leaves I wanted just from a quick sketch and going over it with a pen.

I felt a bit stressed about starting. Then I just went ahead and drew using a pencil. I’d like to wait for instructions before I start painting. My critique was easier and had better flow than my drawing. I’d like to even that out as I get better. The most interesting thing I noticed was that I thought the bird was facing me so that I got the right and left legs mixed up. That is one point for drawing over just taking a photo - analyzing what you see. Probably the best advantage of the photo - you’ve got it before the bird takes off.

I started with a light pencil outline, then added color with watercolor pencils, with which I have no experience. Not especially satisfied with the color from these pencils, so I'd like to try watercolor paint next time.  I like working from photos because in the wild you usually get only a quick glimpse of a bird. They don't stand still for long (except Great Blue Herons, who will stand motionless for hours).

I usually draw from photo for inspiration but not for exact likeness, close but not exact. I want to get better at drawing live  examples . Might still take photo for color reference and the patterns on subject till I get better  at drawing from live forms.   Hoping to sharpen drawing skills  from live nature forms first then develop better water color painting and notes and super simple color. I am not fast at drawing from live objects so this  is going to be a challenge for me, but I look forward to it.   Joan Stanton

• Well , here is my first horrible attempt with pure water color. I normally paint with gouache or water color pencil. Hoping to learn more techniques from this course.  Joan Stanton

It was fun to not think or add judgement to my first drawing - I'm new so it can be bad. It didn't end up looking terrible and I found that when I took the pressure off I also focused more on what the bird was perched on. I missed the moss and lichen but adding the leaves made the whole experience for me. Lil yellow came out looking as happy as I am right now!

Drawing is something out of my comfort zone, but hope to improve upon during this course. It was good to be able to refer back to the photo when I was drawing.  The branches and leaves were somewhat easy to draw. But getting the proportions of all items in the photo was a bit challenging along with drawing the warbler's head. My drawing is not ready for prime time showing....maybe next time.

I enjoyed drawing the picture.  It is certainly apparent that drawing it really make me notice lots of details. 

I found this sketch very difficult (challenging?), especially getting the proper proportions and placement of the bill and eye. Obviously, I still have a lot to learn about drawing feet. The textures and colors of the branch, and particularly the lichen, were a challenge. The bill is one of the key features distinguishing warblers, so I struggled to get the size and shape of the bill right. I'd draw it too large, then erase it and draw it again but this time too short, then again too large, then again too short. I drew 5 or 6 iterations of the bill and I'm still not sure it's correct.   This is my first attempt at seriously using colored pencils. I found it both satisfying and frustrating. It was satisfying to be able to add a bit of color to my sketch and it was easy to control where the color went, but it was frustrating in that all the colors appeared very pale and lacked vibrancy. I used colored pencils that I had on hand from a prior effort with "adult coloring books" and I was frustrated by my limited palette and inability to blend colors.   I look forward to learning to use and mix watercolors and hopefully get more vibrant colors and a wider range of shades and hues.

1. I was, at first, afraid...anxious. I wanted to do well, but I was afraid of creating something terrible here at the beginning. Patience came easily once I started drawing. Attention and forgetting time are natural to me. Getting the angles and attitudes correct was challenging. My warbler's head is still a bit too tall. Maybe more round than oval? Getting the forward-lean sleekness of the bird was difficult. 2. I definitely noticed new things like the moss at the base of the branch junction the bird is perched on. This and the bites out of many of the leaves (insect bites, I assume?) were things I didn't see until I attempted to draw them. Also, the knobbiness of the branch, the light and dark sides of individual leaves, the amount of black in the bird's tail feathers...all of these were details I didn't see in this picture until I attempted to draw the picture.  For a difference this would make, I think this level of detail would help my ability to identify similar birds. Also, even more than simply identification, the appreciation of a bird's (or a branches) beauty grows with the attention I dedicate to it. I've noticed this with the birds that regularly return to my feeder. I never realized how formal and sleek chickadees were until I observed their tail feather patterns day by day. Similarly, the intensity of a red breasted nuthatch when it fights alone for its spot on the feeder formerly occupied by four chickadees than pauses curling it's body out to stare down any potential combatants. I also included my 9-year-old son's drawing. He saw what I was doing and asked to sit and join me. I've wanted to get both my boys more into birding as I fall more in love with it, and this was a great step in that direction. For him: 1. It looked pretty hard, but everything was actually easier than I thought. 2. Probably the details on the leaves and how there were more than one in some places that I thought was just one big one. Now I know that some hard drawings you have to look at pictures and you could get pretty good at it.

I enjoyed interpreting the little textures and values of the lichen and moss on the branch. Drawing allows you to remember things more vividly than a photograph does.

I enjoyed the process of drawing the photo. The instruction said to draw following Liz' instruction but I didn't find this piece. From the comments and general feel, I assumed we could do as little or as much as we wanted. I used pencil sketching and played with the watercolour box. It was interesting looking at the bird to see that there was some shading that almost needed a grey colour. I chose not to mix colours but go quickly with what I had.  Really fun!

I have to say the drawing process was super fun!

My water color soaked up the pen and made my drawing look dirty. :(

l

I wasn't sure how long to spend drawing it. If it was in the field I suppose it would be a quick gesture drawing depending on how long the bird could stay still. The advantage of the photo would be adding more detail.

I was hesitant to start and then pushed myself to rush right in & ended up starting too high on the page so the top of the bird's head is cut off. But once i realized that i relaxed about getting it 'right' this first time. I found myself drawn (pun intended) to the branches in leaves, as a result, zeroing in on the bird's feet, the lichen, leaves & shadowing, which i might not have really noticed if not trying to draw the picture. So i think that drawing in nature journaling leads to looking much more closely at things like beak & wing structures, claws around branches, etc., & could produce richer connections with the subject and so possibly stronger memories of the experience than just taking a photo. . .

i felt like i was outside looking at a real bird. I realized that there were tiny strikes of dark yellow on the underside of the belly!

If this turns out to be a double submission, please excuse!  I found that I can focus on the topic and ignore extraneous details, but I had to work on it, since everything in the photo was clear and detailed.  This gave me an accurate portrayal of the bird, and I was able to concentrate on the details in a way that I wouldn't have been able to if I was doing this while watching it.  Photos provide a good resource to go to when, after an observation outside, I want to go back and check details on what I've captured in drawing.  On a technical note,  I was concerned how I was going to show the various shades and tones of yellow, and scoured my pencil box for the "right" color to use.  I finally landed on using one color, and found that my shading with a graphite pencil provided the shading I was looking for.  A good lesson learned!

I I know the bird and so was negotiating between what I saw in the photo and what I know about the bird, its habits, etc. That was interesting! I found myself quite interested in the branch and the leaves...a fun exercise! Similarly to taking photos, finding "the focus" of the shot is problematic for me. I see a bird and it looks awesome and so I get my camera ready and once I am looking at the viewfinder I realize the berries to the side of the bird are so striking and the marsh behind it so alive... need to reflect on this longer~

The photo was nice for reasons many others have mentioned: static image, ability to zoom in, etc. I did find it difficult to capture the essence of the warbler and got caught in the liminal space between quick sketch and detail. I think you can see my indecision in this drawing, especially in the bird itself... I'm looking forward to feeling more natural with the process so my hesitations stay out of my images and I can accurately reflect my subjects personality and being :)

This was fun! I definitely noticed things that I might not have if just taking a photo—like the way some of the feathers looked like scales. Which prompted all kinds of associations.

One of the unexpected benefits of working from a photo was the ability to zoom in to investigate the details. I'm looking forward to working on my proportions and watercoloring. Both were very challenging.

I feel ok with the drawing but defiantly with practice improve I'm sure.

I don't have my full-sized journal yet so did this assignment on a small sketch pad--I think it will be easier with a larger surface to work on! 1. How did you feel about drawing from the photo? What came easily and what was challenging? Honestly, I felt relieved I wasn’t trying to capture a bird in real time! It was still a challenge however. I wasn't sure where to start so found myself defaulting initially back to those geometric shapes learned in school–bird are ovals, as D.J. said! But once I felt I had the head and back shaped correctly, it was easier to fill in the other details proportionately. I struggled with the beak and made many revisions there, while the wings, legs, markings and branch came easier. I am very curious to learn strategies for field sketching, when birds, bugs, leaves, etc. are moving around and not holding perfectly still! 2. Was there anything in the photo that you might not have noticed if you weren’t asked to draw it? Would this make a difference when nature journaling? There were many small details in the photo I didn’t notice until I reached that area on my sketch, like the fact that the markings on the underbelly are a different color than those on the wings. Leaving that out wouldn’t be detrimental to a nature journal, but the act of drawing and observing it adds more to the journaling experience. It’s a reminder to pause and stop our brains from filling in the blanks!

Well that didn't go as planned ;) This was my first attempt at drawing anything in years. I need to get some drawing pencils. I didn't think to add color yet. Drawing did force me to notice details I would have missed-such as the streaking on the belly, and the way the feet sit on the branch. Details I would not have have likely noticed if looking at the live bird.

There is still so much new to learn - about the general shape of a bird, how the feathers of the wings rest against the body, where the beak sits in the face, etc. I spent a lot of time trying to get the facial expression right. I think when I draw from Nature I will just focus on the shape first, and then try to add detail when I have more experience. I haven't used water colors before, so I'm starting out with colored pencils (just pulled out this box that I used to make botanical sketches 40 years ago).

1.  I enjoyed drawing from the photo, easier to look at details and capture what I am seeing.  Challenging was getting the proportions correct, and not being comfortable trying out the watercolors yet.  2.  I noticed the moss and lichen on the branches, and where the darker areas were on the bird.  It would make a difference depending on what I was intending to capture, and brings in details about the habitat.

As for photography versus live model, I already find it hard to spot warblers with binoculars so drawing a bird in situ seems to me about impossible Of course, other species can be drawn live more easily, for ex. great blue heron, feeding ducks and I am looking forward to trying that next spring.

I spent a lot of time trying to get the shape and proportions correctly with pencil.  Colouring the fine black lines on the wing and red streaks on the breast without the lines becoming blurry was another difficulty. As I was using WC pencils for the first time, it was trial and error finding the right colours as well. I also wondered how to do the colouring in of the warbler. I started by spreading a light yellow all over the bird as a background and then added darker colours (orange, ochre and last black).  Sometimes, the colours bled  and ended up with a  muddy look. Eraser particles tended to get stuck on the wet paper. I used mixed medi paper and F-C watercolour pencils. I am, of course, open and eager for suggestions and constructive criticism. Thank-you for your attention Michel

Drawing from a photo is easier than drawing while looking at a bird. Getting the exact shape and gestalt of the bird is difficult. Seeing samples from other students' drawings is quite intimidating!. I'll learn how to import!

I enjoyed it, since the bird was sitting still. Although I found it slightly intimidating at first, I did enjoy the overall experience. Getting the proportions right is something I need to work on. Also the slight angle of the head was challenging. 2) Yes if I would not have noticed the different colours of the branches, or the different colours in stripes on the chest of the Warbler. I hope to improve my drawing skills when nature journaling  

1. How did you feel about drawing from the photo? Good.  It gave me lots of time to observe the bird. 2. What came easily and what was challenging? The wing was challenging. The head was easier--less detail. 3. Was there anything in the photo that you might not have noticed if you weren’t asked to draw it? Would this make a difference when nature journaling?  I don't think I would have noticed all the black lines in the wing and the detail of the stripes on its chest. I guess the difference would depend on the purpose of the journal entry.

I love trying to draw/paint from a good photo like this.  I think I got the form down pretty well.  The proportions may be off a little, but not too bad.  I felt like it wasn't as vibrant as I wanted it to be so I added a second darker color to the background for added contrast.

1.  I was very intimated by the process.  So much that I put it off for days.  But once I started I felt very good.  I realized that I need to develop my patience and slow down.  2.  Yes, the wings.  Yes absolutely.

1. It was fun and interesting to draw from the photo. I noticed right away that preparing to draw/paint made me look much more closely at the details of the bird. The general shape was easy but capturing the nuances is hard. The particular way the bird is holding his head and body is hard to capture. 2. There is lots in the photo I would not have noticed, like the streaks of red on the breast and how some of the wing and tail feathers are primarily black. I would like to learn how to capture some of these important details without getting too hung up on trying to produce a ‘technical drawing’ of whatever I am seeing.

1. Drawing from the photo was fun! The fact the bird is sitting still makes it easier. When drawing from a photo the challenge is not experiencing the habitat. 2. I didn't see the moss on the sticks until we had to look closer to make the artwork. And yes, that makes a difference with nature journaling for sure.  

1. Drawing from photos is my comfort zone. Yet, in this particular pic, it was hard for me to catch the proportions/shape of the bird. 2. The proportion of the head to the body, and the tail to the body. Yes, the shape is very important for nature journaling, because it is part of the identification process.

This was tricky for me but I will say it’s a lot easier when the bird isn’t moving lol. Excited to see how I improve

1. At the beggining I felt it was really difficult, I thought the backgruond was easier to start on. 2. A lot of details in colors, shapes, shadows, etc.

sketching created a type of investment into the process.

1. Drawing from a photo has the clear advantage of the stillness of the subject. I can't imagine being able to capture the tiny claws of a warbler from life. I can't say any of it came easily, but I enjoyed the process of trying. The flatness of the near-consistent yellow of the bird made indicating any kind of contour -- already a challenge -- even harder. 2. Even though I am a "plant person" I spent some time thinking about what kind of twig this was, even though I didn't try to draw it. Considering the context of where the subject is (and where I am) will be an interesting aspect of nature journaling, I think.

My first attemt was in charcoal pencil, this one is in graphite pencil. Much room for improvement, and I look forward to getting better. 

It's been years since I've drawn and seems I'm more free-form in my later years, but it was fun and I can see how much I can improve. Very exciting!

As an avid birder, the challenge is getting the right proportions on a bird I know very well.  I am keen to learn to illustrate what I see rather than what I know to be true from lots of experience observing.  I have a long way to go, excited for this challenge.

Drawing from photo was good. I noticed a lot of details I wouldn’t ordinarily see.

1. Was very thankful the image wasn't moving! The biggest challenge was proportion. 2. The beak shape, especially the curve at the tip. Helps to understand a warbler beak a little better. Yes, this will help journaling!

At first I was nervous about getting the drawing “just right”, but then I relaxed and just did my best to notice curves and small shapes and put them together. My goal for this class is to learn to observe more in nature and make a record for myself of what I saw.  So I need to be nice to myself and have fun. I had a hard time getting the shape of the head and beak to look natural, but I feel good about what I got in the end.  I might not have noticed the texture of the bark and mosses.  I think the branch, leaves, and moss all help tell the story.

I appreciated drawing from a photo because it didn't move.  When I looked at it on my phone I noticed the colors, and when I expanded it on my desktop computer, I was amazed at the details.  In my brain, I think of feathers one way, but in the photo, you see how many different textures and colors are really present.  I was also surprised by the size of the bird's claws - I don't think I would have noticed that if not for the photo.  Until I read other's comments, I wasn't really paying attention to the context - the branch.  I usually watch birds at my feeders, but I'm sure that where this bird is perched is significant - hence, the importance of noting PLACE in my journaling.

My first sketch...I spent about 25 minutes. I feel that the detail and shading are most challenging. Also getting the proportions right. It's interesting how a slight variation in head shape and beak length will change the bird completely. My first attempt is very elementary and I look forward to improvement.

Water colors are a lesser-used medium for me. I found myslef applying the color as I would with an acrylic and that was problematic. I thoroughly enjoyed the beautiful detail in the feathers. All in all the end product was not too bad but I definately have tons of room to grow .

It appears easy to see the bird, the branches and leaves. I did use the round ball approach, perhaps easier to see as it was "still".  I expect the detail would be quite different in the field, learning what to note and what to omit may be a challenge?

Some comfort in drawing from photo, but I notice it doesn’t feel very dynamic.  I tried drawing the underlying circle and egg shapes, then a contour drawing.  The contour drawing worked better for me since I had to look at it so carefully; with the shape approach I was more in my head.  I notice the color of the stripes on the chest through drawing, even though I wasn’t using color.

At first I was intimidated, but it was a bit easier than I thought. Drawing the various types of feathers is challenging.  wouldn't have paid as close attention to that if I was not drawing it. I also paid more attention to the various angles of the body and the negative space (learned about that in Liz's last class.) Since it was a photo, I didn't even think to write notes until I looked at the comments below. I think a photo is definitely easier for birds that don't stay still but I would love to be able to draw more quickly and capture general gestures of wildlife on the move.

I appreciate drawing from a photo because I can spend as much on details as I want. I can really pay attention to the direction and length of feathers, the light in the eye and beak and the strength and grip of the bird. I absolutely cannot accurately portray feathers - I get lost in the number and closeness of the various lengths and shapes (ugh). I think when nature journaling, I might use my experience from drawing from a photo to better understand the shape of birds I regularly see and allow the journaling to capture posture and action and the context of the garden, yard, trail, etc.

As you can see the proportions are off and values aren’t necessarily interesting to view. I was struck by the ease that one of the sample journal artists drew his birds. They were believable images. I really want to capture the essence of what I am seeing. My feelings about the subject. So much to learn and practice as I ease into another phase of life. How can I share the importance of small spider mites? Anytime I post a drawing I am afraid of what I didn’t accomplish or portray. Once it is posted it is available to the world at large for critical view.

I don't have any drawing or sketching experience, so I felt uncomfortable doing this exercise. But I'm glad I attempted it. Drawing forces you to look at more details than if you were just looking at a photo and it improves your observational skills. In areas in which your drawing skills are weak, you can write what feature you were trying to portray. On the other hand, photos are 3D and more lifelike looking. Nature journaling feels like a good way to pique your interests in the natural world.

I was quite nervous about drawing. I've never considered myself good at discerning perspective, and it took me several tries to get the size of the head in proportion to the rest of the body. The result is acceptable, but I still feel dissatisfied with my ability to really judge the proportions or perspective correctly. However, without drawing the image, I would have been less likely to notice the bird was actually facing away from me, turning back to look. I might not have noticed the way the moss clings to the twigs, or the way the fluff of the breast extends over the legs. I wouldn't have noticed some of the leaves have been chewed on by something, and the way the toes extend below the twig. Drawing gives me a chance to ponder the details and "see" more clearly, even if the result of my drawing isn't quite as detailed or clear as the photo.

Drawing from a photo lets me go back and forth a lot to try to get the lines right. Nothing came easily. Getting the proportions right was difficult. I made a pencil sketch  and it's hard to get the shadings right. I paid  attention to more details  than I would have  had I  just looked at the photo. Yes, drawing could make a huge difference to  my observational skills

1) I like drawing from a photo.  The bird doesn't move and I can get posture and proportion better.  I can erase and correct.  I'm still working on the need to get an "A" on the test.  I found the wings to be really challenging.  How much detail to put in and how to draw what i was really seeing. 2) I didn't notice all the lichen and interesting stuff going on on the limb until I started trying to draw it. This definitely would make a difference in nature journaling.  I guess there's always a decision about where to stop and what details to put in.

It went better than I thought it would! I was very nervous and had to get over my innate need to get an "A" on every test -- this wasn't even a test! It was nice to work from a photo, because the subject was standing still. It was nice to be able see every detail. Working just in pencil, it was hard to capture the difference between shadows and actual black or brown feathers. If I had not had to draw the bird, I don't think I would have been so aware that certain feathers were very sharp and straight, and others more soft and fluffy. It was hard to know when to stop.

1. I think drawings have a more personal advantage over photos. There's more effort and emotion put into them, and the artist can add their own personal touches and interpretation. The advantage photos have over drawings however is that they're more realistic, and they can capture the moment perfectly. 2. Drawing from the photo was a lot of fun. The most difficult part for me was getting the legs and feet right. I have always struggled with this when depicting birds. I hope that I can improve by the end of this course. 3. If I wasn't asked to draw this Warbler, I wouldn't have noticed the touches of yellow on its feet. It wouldn't make a huge difference in nature journaling, but if it was a more distinct characteristic on the bird ex.(the yellow feet of the Snowy Egret) than it would make a bigger difference.

Sorry I inserted two images by mistake. Getting used to how this works! I find it easier to draw from a picture rather than in real time. Likely because that is how I drew in the past and the three dimensional aspect is different from a picture. I look forward to learning how to draw in the field. I find the proportions and the detail difficult. I enjoyed examining the bird and the leaves, the variations of color and shading. I would like to learn how to draw quick and simple sketches with enough detail to identify species later on. Looking forward to more lessons!

1.I liked drawing from the photo - it was easier for me than drawing from a painting. or drawing from life. Could see details. But is 2 dimensional. Nothing comes easily for me when drawing or sketching.  I will be 79 in a couple of days and I have always had trouble with spatial perception and transferring what I see to paper.  I think I am finally beginning to learn how to look at something and figure out how the parts make up the whole. 2.I probably would not have noticed the ruffled feathers on the belly, the layering of the wing feathers, and the slight shadowing on the far side of the throat. I think it would make a difference. Your sketch would look too flat if it did not indicate this dimensionality. I can see why some journalists choose to have small side boxes showing details like the above.

First attempt at Yellow Warbler. Proportions are off; not quite plump enough. The process draws attention to structure and details that would not have been otherwise evident - the layers of feathers, the subtle shading. First time I've used colored pencils in a drawing. Shading my pencil, dark lines via pen.  Would love to know how to draw that bark twig realistically. 

• Using only pencil I found myself looking more at the detail to try and express the colour differences in the birds plumage and the structure of each lichen a little more, this I would not have noticed so easily had I not drawn them. The blemishes on the leaves, and the amount of variation in colour on the warbler I dont think I would have taken as much notice of either. Really enjoyed this exercise!

I enjoyed drawing this Yellow Warbler from its photo, although it would also be interesting to draw it from life.  The photo is two dimensional, but it does help me to see details, form, etc., in an accurate way.  As I am not a trained artist, I do find this challenging, but my naturalist training is helping me with composition, relative size in relation to the branch, and focusing on the details.  If I had not been asked to draw it, I might have missed the bit of gray lichen in the lower left corner, on the branch.  In nature journaling, it can be important to capture such a detail, unless you want to focus only on the bird itself.

Noticing details came easy but it was hard to show them with just pencil. Labels helped and I was happy with the capturing of those key features. When it was done I noticed that the shape wasn't quite right and I'd like to try that again. It felt like I went straight to the ID details and forgot to start with those basic shapes. Since I didn't have color I found myself thinking more deeply about how to clearly communicate the colors in words.

I forgot to add my sketch. My pencil wanted to be everywhere. Trying to figure our proportions and, well, moving from blob to bird…really a challenge for me.

I notice so many more details now when I am sketching. Many details I can translate onto my page, or even suggest them. That is a little frustrating. Using the sketchy-sketchy technique has really help. I’m learning what to leave and what to erase. Drawing from a photo feel like a great way to start. My subject doesn’t move, the light remains consistent. Doing it on the fly outside feels like a pipe-dream at this time, but I’m ready and willing to improve and try!

So this is my attempt at the Yellow Warbler, which was interesting experience that I really enjoyed! My experience in drawing is very limited but I had the luxury of a still image. I found the easiest and (I say easiest not lightly) part for me was the slow sketch of the bird and then more difficult as I tried to add the extra details of the bird. then came the watercolours, with no experience and the recommended course material I began to slop the colours on. It became a exercise in colour management and water control fairly quickly. Saying that some of the shading and lighter browns I wouldn’t have noticed at first if I didn’t take my time so that was incredibly rewarding. Personally I had a excellent time and I’m fairly proud of what I produced. Next time I would incorporate a journal style and some notes. The yellow warbler

I usually get very nervous when drawing. I'd like to know how to be more relaxed and draw more comfortably.

I liked how I had to really spend time tuning in and focusing intently to see all the details.  

It was a fun task.  Getting the different layers of feathers is a challenge.  And proportion  along with details offer their own difficulty for me.  With the picture to refer to is absolutely a help and I can imagine trying to draw this bird as it is moving, standing still only a short time will need some good advice.

Drawing from the photo was easy because the bird didn't move and I had plenty of time to draw everything I saw.  The challenging part was figuring out what to draw first and making sure of placement and that everything was the correct size.  If I wasn't asked to draw the picture I might not have noticed the position of the Warbler's legs, one seems to be straight and the other is bent.  I think that might make a difference when nature journaling  because  it shows how the bird balances  on a branch.

I realized when doing this sketch that it required time, which is good for me to experience as I often guide youth in nature journaling, and this is the first time I have taken time to sketch myself.  And for me, this is pretty good.  I look forward to getting better!  The advantages of sketching over photos is that one becomes intimately connected to the organism observing.  The internal and eternal connection is a strong bond.  Another advantage is that the details are noticed.  The advantages of photos is that they show precisely what the organism looks like.  Photos can be revisited for a specific point in time with out change, such as a quick visit by a bird or an organism that will change over time, such as a flower.  I enjoyed this exercise and look forward to the next. 

The outline was challenging as were the small details and the shading. I noticed a lot about the birds feathers and how they fall together on its back and a lot about the body shape and the coloring and the head shape.

Im not yet at all confident with the media (used pencil, ink pen, watercolor pencils), but I enjoyed the exercise. I used it to learn about the parts if a bird (mainly the feathers). It was challenging to convey exact feathers as well as feeling of feathers ( some look fluffy and I was not able to convey that). It was good to have the photo so able to take time to do the drawing. I spotted many things I probably would not have seen in field, unless the bird is very cooperative and close by!

Thank you, Liz, for creating this course.

This was an enjoyable exercise.  Watercolors are new to me, so they were the most challenging part of the exercise.  Things I would not have noticed without drawing this photo are 1) the shape of the wings laying on the warbler's back, 2) the way the rusty red streaks grew softer further down on the breast, and 3) the loose grip of the warbler's feet on the branch below it.  I look forward to seeing improvement in my art as I continue this course.

Getting the stance seemed really important. Loved the contrast between the dark eye and bill and the yellow of the feathers.  What a yellow! Very different from a goldfinch. It made me think of whether colored pencils can even approximate nature's hues.  What color would I choose to color this bird? And the rusty streaks on the breast! Swoon!

I am looking forward to improving my drawing skills by the end of this course! I did the sketch quickly as if I was watching a real bird who would move any second. I think that helped me get a gestalt that has some energy . Would like to get a few more well crafted details. I might not have noticed the shape of the bill if I had not drawn the picture. Since the bill is an id marker I think it would make a difference in a nature journal.

I really enjoyed this. The warbler is very cute in the picture.

Not much art experience here: I am relieved that my pencil sketch is at least identifiable as a bird.

Drawing from the photo doesn't seem as daunting as drawing moving nature.  I did notice more of the dark markings from the photo while painting it.

I was happy to be drawing from an image that wasn't moving about, changing positions.  I sketched with a #2 pencil and did not add color.  Might not have noticed leg color and toes without sketching.  Had trouble with the slight tilt of the head.  Definitely flatter than it should be.  Transition from wing to back was challenging.

I liked the fact that the bird didn’t move so I could really study it in one position and with constant light. I also could zoom in when I was unsure of the details of what I was seeing. Ironically, that also made it harder in some respects because it played to my tendency to be overly detail-oriented which took my attention away from the general proportions. I wouldn’t have notice the shape of the bill and the surprisingly rounded, low hanging belly if I hadn’t drawn it.

I think drawing from a photo seems easy at first, but in regards to depth perception, my bird turned out much flatter. Still, the photo does show colors that might not have been noticed in nature, particularly if one is not familiar with the bird.

It felt nice, although strange. The legs came easily but the shape of the head and details in the wing not so much. Drawing makes me focus on shape but I definitely simplified it and made it flatter than it should be.

I loved the activity

In the very short class I took with you earlier this year, you really liberated me from feeling like I need to draw perfectly.  I started by looking at bits and pieces of shapes and shadows and not thinking so much about a bird.  It was super relaxing because I wasn't constantly criticizing every pencil stroke, more just having fun and wondering if my drawing would fit on the page. :) Making it look three dimensional is hard for me. Really seeing the lines, the fluff, the feather contours came easily.  I would not have noticed how much dark smudgy coloring is on this little Warbler if I hadn't been drawing it.

It was a bit challenging, but not overwhelming. I drew some ovals and circles, like D.J. had done. that helped. And then kept making a lot of adjustments, erasing, redrawing. Trying to get proportions and  angles of the bill, tail, legs, wings, with respect to each other. I just did pencil for now, but if I had painted in color, I think I'd recognize it. It was fun to try this. And just that one tip from D.J. helped me get started. As I drew, I kept noticing more about the bird, that I did not pick up on first glance, such as all the detail in the wings. With photos, I have mainly looked at those reddish streaks on the yellow breast. Also, shape of the bill, angle to the head, size of the eye. Doing this drawing, I realize that by doing the nature journaling, I will cultivate my observation skills and attention to detail. Even the stance of the bird, its posture, and I wonder, what is the habitat, what kind of tree is it sitting on? These are things I would try to draw and take notes on, to investigate later.

I answered the questions on the page.  I think there is a lot of room for growth here, but this first attempt made me happy and excited to see where I go as I progress through the course.  Seeing everyone else's work, really inspired me, as well!

I forgot to add an image to my comment. Here we go. {shudders}

I only used my pencil for this because I'm a stick figure drawer with no watercolor experience. It was daunting to start. And my scale is way off. There's lots of lichen on the branch the warbler is on. Some of the leaves have been nibbled. And I've never noticed the reddish-brown 'stripes' on the warbler's belly before.

1. I felt pretty good about drawing the photo. I found it  pretty easy to draw the warbler. It was difficult to get the wings right. At first I used the water brush to paint the wings, but I couldn't get the lines thin enough so it turned into a black blob. Then I painted over the wings with yellow and restarted them. I decided to use a very thin paint brush to get fine lines.2. I would not have noticed the position of the feet or how the wings fold.This would make a difference in nature journaling because your drawing would be more realistic with the more detail you can add.

1.  I draw from reference photos a lot, so this felt normal. Drawing the shape of the bird and the branch came easily. However, trying to get all the details in (especially the wing) and enough contrast using just a mechanical pencil was a little challenging. 2. If I wasn't asked to draw it, I would not have noticed the way the the light and shadows fall on the bird. I also paid a lot more attention to the warbler's feet and how the are clutching the branch in a surprisingly loose looking way.

1. The drawing is okay for a first time - nothing special. Proportions seem alright, shading is meh. 2. What did I notice in drawing? Details! I would otherwise 'see' the whole without necessarily noticing all the minutiae that actually make up the image. 3. I'm an archaeologist and we typically draw our artifacts and features, along with photographing them. Why? Because photographs provide us with an objective, 'scientific' image (more or less), while drawings pull the subjective human mind into the object. In drawing, we represent only those details that help us tell the story's picture - the characteristics that are most important to us.

I had a good time doing it.  It took me a while because I’m traveling and I don’t always have access to Wi-Fi.  My friend Francis and I have been zooming and trying to do the lesson together.  I like drawing from photos because I can take my time getting the image on paper.  It’s also easier to capture details, that I may miss if I was drawing in plain air.               

I liked being able to refer back to something that doesn’t move. While drawing I noticed the color variations in the Wabler, bark and leaves. I do believe this would make an excellent reference to an unfinished drawing

The advantage of drawing from a photo was the subject never moved. One of the problems I had was trying to paint in the details on such a small image.

I like drawing from a photo reference.  However, the challenge for me was seeing the fine details in the photo.  I had difficulty with the background.  I wondered if I should have did the background color first then paint over it?  Should I have used a different brush?  Did I use too much water?  I had a harder time manipulating the paint to cover the negative space as opposed to coloring in the subject.  I think I would have seen more details to add if I was nature journaling.

I had fun doing this I definetly noticed the way the light reflected on his eye, the way the wing feathers layer and the way it’s toes grip the branch. Also I love seeing all of your beautiful sketches.

Not having drawn or sketched in over 30 years, i felt a bit anxious.  With that said, i actually enjoyed it and I don't think i did too bad a job, although scrolling through some of the sketches below, I'm definitely a first class beginner! I actually found the beak and the feet to be the most challenging.  Getting the correct length and angle of each was difficult for me.  If i had not drawn this bird, i probably would not have noticed the stripes in the underbelly.  As well as the curve of his claws as they clutch the branch.  I think this is what draws me to nature journaling vs photography.  Noticing details definitely makes a difference.

I felt pretty good drawing from the photo. For me drawing the warbler was fairly easy. I found it challenging to paint the bird with detail using a water brush. I could not get thin, detailed lines so I decided to paint details with a thin paint brush. If I was not asked to draw the photo I would not have realized how many layers of feathers there are on the wings and how they all fold together perfectly. Noticing how the wings fold would make a difference when nature journaling because the more details you can include, the better and more accurate your drawings will be.

1. I like jumping right into drawing. At first I was just going to use pencil, but I so love the vibrant yellow and the contrasting black that I decide to break out the colored pencils. (I haven't a clue how to use watercolor yet.) The general outline of the bird came fairly easily, but the folded wing was hard, with its layered feathers. 2. I would not have noticed how the warbler's talons gripped the branch, nor how the feathers in the wing layer up sort of like a folding fan. I also would not have noticed the sparkle in the bird's eye, the brownish feathers on its belly, or the slight bluish cast to its beak. 3. Having a photo in which the bird is captured in a pose makes the whole process a lot easier. I imagine it will be incredibly difficult to capture this amount of detail in the field, where the bird would be in motion and likely would fly away.

• Drawing from a photo is going from 2 dimensions to 2 dimensions, it takes skill but looses some of the magic of 3-D to 2-D. On the other hand, your subject remains still so you can pick up on the nuances. There were things I would not have noticed if I were not drawing it. I would not have seen the insect bite in the leaf and might not have noticed the moss or lichen on the tree. I also was made very aware of how the birds feet wrapped around the twig and I might not have made note of that and just been dazzled by the color of the bird.

I had fun sketching and painting the Yellow Warbler. I love how the bird is bright yellow and the contrasting orange stripes (chest) and black stripes (wings) make the bird stand out in the green background. I wasn't able to make the stripes and the yellow turned out more greenish. But, I think I did a great job for my first try!

1. I've done most of my nature journaling from photos, which I've always thought is cheating... in a way. Yellow Warblers in the flesh do not hold-the-heck still so I don't have to fight to keep its details in my noggin. It's easier to draw a motionless bird in a photo. 2. Loads more details in photos. You can see where and how the feathers lie. I think for a person with a poor memory for moving birbs, photos give greater detail, but weak satisfaction. My Internet service is wonky, so hope this wasn't my second post on this topic.

  Drawing makes me notice details on the bird and background I would not necessarily pay attention to when birding or taking a photograph of the bird. This is what makes nature journaling fun. You begin to ask what insects the bird may be eating in the tree or bush with insect damaged leaves. You want to know more about the kind of bush and what kind of lichen is growing on it. Getting the correct proportions is always a challenge to me. A birds complex wing feather arrangements are another challenge. Also the angle of the photograph foreshortens some aspects of a bird which can also present problems. T

Drawing makes you look at the details.  You can't draw each detail, but you are picking out the exact form, the shades of color that identify the bird.  Drawing made me not only look at the bird, but at the twig it was sitting on, that the twig had growths on it, that some of the leaves were damaged and eaten.    Drawing makes you look at all the details, instead of just writing that the bird is a yellow warbler.

Capturing the essence of the feathers was a challenge. I saw distinct sections of different feather types in the photo but had trouble making those areas distinct in the drawing. I might not have noticed the brown stripey bits in the chest. The yellow/black combinations of the wing feathers are more striking but the caramel colors in the stripes are lovely. Making those tones distinct from the black was a challenge. When nature journaling, looking for those secondary areas would be important.

1. Drawing from the photo felt alright, however, it made me really fussy about the accuracy of what I was drawing. Am I drawing what is there, or what I think is there. I was curious about whether or not I was paying enough attention to detail. 2. The overall drawing experience was fair, I found the shape of the bird a bit challenging. I didn't't make very much notes either. 3. The lichen. I would have noticed this perhaps, but if I was out in the field I think I might have been captivated by the warbler.

Nice that the bird in the photo stayed still for the entire experience.  :)  My first attempt was too fat, and so I had to erase its belly/breast and skinny it up.  I like the detail in my eye, but it is too big and too far back.  Was going to try to fix it and then decided to embrace it as a first attempt and move on.   Struggled with the bits between the legs, and with balancing shading with wanting to make the black stand out.  Decided to just stick with pencil, which made it hard to distinguish the rusty streaks on the breast.   The details around the eye certainly would have escaped me had I not taken the time to draw it.  And the nostril as well, though I notice now that my attempt to capture that in my drawing was lost when I shaded the beak.  I definitely leaned on some of the skills I learned in your earlier short 1h live lessons earlier this spring!

I noticed so, so much more as I tried to draw—details of the bird itself and my inexperience with pastel pencils, first among those noticings. It was lovely to have the subject still, and I appreciated being able to zoom in for a closer look. I would never have noticed the toes had I not been asked to draw it. Such a surprise that they don’t actually grip the twig, at least not at the moment of the photograph. Such fun to get started!

I I I liked drawing from the photo. It has to be easier than trying to draw a bird in the wild. Is that even possible? They don't tend to stay in one place for very long. Even at our feeders they are constantly coming and going. I found the legs and feet challenging. Seems like  the legs are longer and the feet are bigger than I would have drawn from memory. Worked on the beak for a while and I still didn't get it right. I wouldn't have drawn all the toes. Enlarging the picture helped me to see all of the them. I can definitely see how you have to focus on details and small parts at a time when nature journaling. Otherwise a lot could be missed.

Using the photo, I was able to revise my drawing as many times as needed to correct discrepancies between my drawing and the photo.. I have a difficult time with proportion and tend to make my heads overlarge  I would not have noticed the coloration of the wings with as much precision if not asked to draw. This kind of careful observation is important in differentiating between species and genders. Although I consider myself to be a careful observer this exercise shows me how far from that I really am and how much I need to discipline myself. Drawing the photo of the bird forced me to repeatedly look at the image

I enjoyed drawing from the photo as it provided unlimited time to study the subject. Overall shape came relatively easy. Proportion and perspective were a greater challenge.   I definitely would not have noticed a lot of the more subtle identifying features had I not been asked to draw the warbler. This would make a big difference when nature journaling as I am s rank beginner at drawing and only a moderately experienced birder. I can see how nature journaling will give me a healthy boost up the learning curve.

Much easier to notice the details when working from a photo. If drawing in the field, would not have spent as much time noticing the lichens on the branches. Working with watercolors is a challenge for me, and I've never used this type of brush! Hoping to master it a bit better by the end!

., n I noticed how long the birds feet were, I feel okay about the drawing, I think my lead may have been a little soft. Just sitting down to draw was the hardest, getting going. Then I didn't want to stop. I wonder how to draw/sketch this bird in the wild as they don't sit still for very long, so this was nice, sketching from the photo.

Much easier to draw from a photo since the subject doesn’t move as others have said. Shading came easily with pencil but proportions challenging, I didn’t erase though. I’ve never understood wing patterns and lengths before so this drawing was very helpful in that regard. The cheek, shoulder, breast and short, medium, long and tail feathers were clear.

Loved sitting on the deck and sketching--I can relate to many others' thoughts and feelings. Someday I'll finish viewing everyone's posts. How wonderful that so many people are on this journey together!

Advantages of Drawings: Makes the viewer pay more attention to detail. Has more character than a photo. You can choose what details to include. Advantages of Photos: Captures all the details correctly. A drawing could be anatomically incorrect. Usually includes color which a simple sketch does not.

Drawing helps to focus the eye on fine details and to journal them for later memory.

• 

I'm excited to learn more about capturing color and shading with just pencil--that was the most challenging part for me with this exercise. This was a lot of fun!

A photograph keeps the subject still which is an advantage. The challenge was paying attention to proportions, what makes this bird look like this bird.

it  made me concentrate but i used to much water with the water colors . the diffrent shads of yellow

Great fun doing this exercise.  But how did I end up with a bird with an attitude?? Beak, eye, and posture a challenge.... Also I didn't start far enough to the right, and it cut my warbler's tail short! Looking forward to more instruction and practice!

this was an enjoyable first attempt. I also enjoyed seeing the work of others...

Enjoyable for sure.  It will be a challenge to capture the image I want to but love the idea that this will call me to be more observant.  Seeking to deepen relationship with the natural world around me, and this will help me pay attention and notice.  That said, getting the proportions was a big challenge and the shadings.  The bill took several takes too.

I spent an hour drawing and painting this bird - and while I’m really quite happy with it, I’m not going to do much drawing or painting if it always takes this long. I hope that speed and getting-it-right-the-first-time are some of the skills I learn in this course! Also hard to imagine trying to capture a bird in the field; good thing my interest is more in plants. ☺️ I enjoyed the idea from one of the journalers about letting your subject jump out of its box a little. Really fun effect!

I found getting details of plumage difficult to get right. Also the lines were not as clear as I would have liked - tried 2H and HB, also a 0.35 Rotring pencil which is what I have. Will try and get the recommended pencil.

It took me a couple days to finally attempt this assignment. I don’t draw, but I want to change that. Nothing came easily. I’m not sure I would have noticed the different shades of yellow, the bird’s legs or the differences in the feathers had I not been drawing. If actually journaling in nature, it would be difficult to see many details since the bird would have been in motion and even the branches and leaves would likely be moving. 

Drawing: It is a record of your visual image of the object(s) you are observing. Photos:  Real specific accuracy such as proportions, dimensions, details, colors (most of the time), etc Challenging: Proportions, and feathers Probably would not have noticed the details in the area where the wing feathers meet the tail.  

1.  It took a few days for me to decide to do the drawing - not sure why, but I think I had some fear that it would be difficult or challenging.  In the end, I enjoyed drawing from the photo and looking at the detail of the bird.  I noticed the details of the feathers, the shape of its various parts.  I was challenged by the proportions, and the surrounding details.  2.  I would not have noticed all the details of the feathers had I not been asked to draw the bird.  Nature journaling, I hope, will allow me to notice details that I might miss otherwise.  I'm wondering especially how to capture bird details from my own observations rather than a photograph.  

1. I enjoyed trying to draw. It is fun to really look at the details and try to recreate them in the sketchbook. That said, the bird in my drawing is too small and its shape is different from that in the photo. Putting the branches in the space was easy but drawing the bird was difficult. There is a lot of detail in the bird from its orientation on the branch to its individual feathers and I did not get those details correct in my drawing. 2. When drawing the leaves I noticed that they were attached alternately and I definitely would not have noticed that if I just looked at the photo. I would have glossed over the blemishes in the leaves as well. So drawing something really improves one's observational skills.

1. I  loved drawing from the photo because it allowed me to observe all of the details and take my time. It was a challenge to include everything and keep my proportions correct.  2. My focus of course was drawn to the bird which allowed me to observe the details including the placement of the toes on the branch. I probably would not notice the alternate veining of the leaves or the details of the lichen on the branch if I had not drawn it.

1 - I LOVED drawing from the photo.  I didn't have to readjust my perspective.  But this isn't really my goal.  It was easy to see details. Challenge was to get relative proportions.  2 - I definitely noticed much more than I would have even if I had been able to look at a bird for the length of time it took to do the drawing.  I noticed the layers of feathers better than I would have in the field.  Noticing these things from a photo will enhance my notice of details in nature.

Drawing from the photo let me take my time.  If I had seen this bird for just a few seconds I might not remember much detail.

I like drawing from a photo.  It helps me to see details and colors.  The bird was relatively easy to draw but the feathers were challenging.  The tree branch with the moss and lichen was challenging also.  I don't know how to shade within a leaf to make it look realistic.  In fact, I don't know if I would be able to notice those details without the photo.  

So many different shades of yellow! Explored mixing colors, some disappointing, some surprising. Sketching took forever as I have had little experience. But it does look like a bird... Looking forward to learning how to achieve some of the things I saw and attempted.

This was my first attempt to draw a bird! And I was surprised how much I enjoyed doing it. I do hope that the yellow warbler will have better proportions at the end of the course! Coloring came the easiest. the shape of the beak I would have not noticed as much. a very good first observation exercise of a bird. Nicole

I like drawing from a photo. I wouldn't have noticed all the details and shapes of the birds and the leaves if I hadn't drawn it.