Forum Role: Participant
Active Since: July 7, 2020
Topics Started: 0
Replies Created: 11

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 11 posts - 1 through 11 (of 11 total)
  • ej
    Participant
    I started exploring Project BudBurst earlier in this class so continued here. PBB is a phenology based observation tool. Participants choose a plant and can either do one time or lifecycle reports including species, location, date, and stage. The database is accessible to anyone  even if they've never submitted data. Students of all ages could easily access the data since there's no log-in required. Students could use in a number of ways - each student could select a species to focus on and compare timing of lifecycle changes. Or all students could focus on a single widespread species and observe at different locations (e.g. near their house).
  • ej
    Participant
    Project: I was most curious about CoCoRahs, but that required ordering a rain gauge, so will have to wait til one arrives... Meanwhile, I did BudBurst which was pretty straightforward. You do need to register to enter data, but then can start doing so immediately. You could actually print off blank report sheets and start collecting data before registering. Registration was quick and it was easy to start entering data from just reading through the basic 1-2-3 overview, though the “Get Started” overview was much more thorough. Challenges: A big challenge I often face with online learning opportunities (which includes many citizen science projects) is finding ones that do not require smartphones or tablets due to regularly having a fair number of participants who don't have or use them and/or working in tight time frames where dealing with tech can eat up a considerable amount of limited time. BudBurst had reasonable balance between high & low tech options. Participants note the species, location, and phenological phase of one or more particular plant. On one end, they could use a smartphone, photograph & upload a plant photo, and enter and submit the data immediately. On the other end BudBurst provides printable report sheets for gathering the same data which one could merely use for their own personal observations and data analysis. And there are many options in between - skip the photo altogether; take photo with a regular camera and upload; collect data on paper (using their forms or creating your own) and upload later. In any case, they can then access their personal data or the BudBurst database to analyze data, identify trends, etc. One other potential challenge - having looked over much of the website, I only noticed photos of plants in full flower, but not photos/illustrations of the plants in their different phases which could be limiting in terms of definitively identifying it before it reaches a clearly identifiable stage (depending on time, ages, and resources). Learning outcomes: At a very basic level, BudBurst resources could be used to teach participants observation skills including how to recognize general and species specific phenophases. Participants could also collect and report phenophase data, use observation or collected data to compare phenophase data by species, location, season, year, habitat, or some growing conditions and analyze potential similarities/differences. Particpants could cross reference with other available data (e.g. weather and compare to weather+phenological phases of different years. Participants could develop theories and further analyze data or design experiments to determine conditions that might affect phenophase timing.
  • ej
    Participant
    I whole-heartedly agree on the inclusion of non-screen approaches. I often work with groups including members who can't, don't, or won't use portable devices due to age, financial, connectivity, technological, philosophical,  privacy, or other concerns. But many of these audiences (retirees, rural families, traditional homeschoolers) have the time, dedication, and interest in being active observers/data collectors/citizen science participants.
  • ej
    Participant
    In general, modeling with your own enthusiasm and curiosity and not getting in the way of theirs. Ideally providing exposure and opportunities to observe, possibly pointing out some things of potential interest (anything from “Look at that!” to open-ended questions), asking guiding/exploratory questions, and providing time for reflection. Like a few others, I often work with groups in limited time spans and goal oriented programming which doesn't lend itself to these approaches, but you can sometimes still sneak a few things in - e.g. take advantage of downtime (walking to next location, breaks, etc by giving a "to think about" question or brainstorm with a partner/in small groups on unknown this-or-thats related to something we just saw. If meeting more than once, you can send them off with similar “homework” but possibly on a larger scale, such as: “Well, we sure saw a lot of crows this week! I wonder if they're being as active other places too? Maybe we can all keep our eyes & ears alert for crows this week and share what we saw/heard at the start of our next meeting” (or draw pictures of things, or take some data, or write a journal reflection, etc.
  • ej
    Participant
    Oops!  The text version of sound map did not retain its format when submitted!!
  • ej
    Participant
    tractor? (v. distant, constant) distant cars (occasional) bullfrog? (v. distant, occasional) leaves rustling leaves rustling leaves rustling                                                                                                                                                             cars insect                                                                                                               driving hitting                                                                                                                       past screen                                                                                                                          (slowing cicadas                                                                                          X                                                                                                        at  trilling toads                                                                                                                          stick                                                    curve) falling leaf skittering along stone walkway I often do a very similar project to the Lemons with oranges or pinecones (actually usually spruce cones) for nature studies. Like the Lemon one, try to get very similar looking ones and have some extras, but I only give vague instructions once they receive it - "look at your cone carefully" for a few minutes. Usually only a few students are able to find theirs - often ones with a distinctive mark but usually a few that were just more carefully observed. This immediately creates a desire for the rest of the students to look at their cone more carefully and we discuss/brainstorm ways before redistributing for a second look (randomly, not trying to give them their original cone back). This is sometimes part of a larger nature studies program that includes plant identification, taxonomy, nature sketching, etc and we return to the concept different ways: using for observational skills to draw more accurately, using to compare/contrast  features often used in identification guides, etc.
  • ej
    Participant
    I don't have a formal background in education, but apparently I've naturally tended towards inquiry based learning, so it was nice to be affirmed in what I've been doing as well as see a more developed framework for the approach to enhance the class/group experience. As to a specific item - I will definitely be using the Vultures: See or Smell as it succinctly (and memorably!) captures so many aspects of the scientific process: beyond the basics of observation, questioning, developing investigation, conclusion but also the importance of repeating and continuing to refine and that even 'great' scientists get things 'wrong'. As the current pandemic has shown, even a surprising amount of adults in our society are uncomfortable with the lack of  a single, straightforward, definitive answer to a myriad of aspects of a novel disease.
  • ej
    Participant
    Position youth as people who do science - engaging students in decision-making and trouble-shooting processes! Frame the work globally & locally - looking for interconnections/crossover which is easy for something like butterfly migration or groups like  lab of O that monitor nationally or beyond. But this is still possible with anything: doing water monitoring? - see if there's citizen science or community groups working on water quality downstream, visit their website or contact. Monitoring bats in central PA? Look up other bat monitoring groups in NM or NZ! What species of bats are they seeing, what are environmental/habitat/disease issues they're facing, what monitoring issues have they run into? Embrace the unexpected - discuss process vs product. If product/results aren't what you expected/robust/usable, have students review the process - what could be changed if the project were done again? Design solutions!      However,  don't invite the unexpected - be sure to have the groundwork in place to proceed. I'm embarrassed to admit the first time I did the Great Backyard Bird Count (with my own kids who were very excited about it after visiting friends with a very active feeder), we got a feeder but I kept forgetting to get bird seed. And when I did remember I forgot the local Agway closed at 5. And then there was a snowstorm. And so forth. I finally got some the day before the 4 day start counted. We got the feeder filled and hung the 1st morning. And....not a single bird all four days. It can take them several weeks to discover  a new feeder. Oops!
  • ej
    Participant
    Great Backyard Bird Count (which as someone noted below is a great, simple, short intro to citizen science), Project Feederwatch - both as a classroom and for students to do at home. For the latter, students experimented on the side with bird feeder styles (we built some in class), different types of birdseed, different locations, etc Nestwatch - we did as a community service project for local nature center. Students built/repaired and installed bird boxes on existing posts, and monitored throughout the season. We did classroom and onsite training - the latter was very important to make sure everyone knew where &  how to open each box as we had several varieties. The nature center let us store a backpack with the essentials (clipboard with data sheets & pens, dental mirror, etc. which was very handy. We split into 3 groups of 4 families. Each group had 5 or 6 nestboxes to check on (which including hiking to them meant 30-60 minutes/visit). The families in each group took turns so that each family only had to check every other week or two. Each student also picked a question to answer (do birds prefer the old or new boxes better? which birds choose the boxes in trees vs on posts? etc) various butterfly & milkweed ones - can't recall which ones in particular Lost Ladybug in conjunction with local children's garden. CSI (water monitoring in Finger Lakes region) NWS Skywarn (weather spotter program) Tips - always test them out yourself before introducing to your class!! Connecting to local entities/turning into a community service project is nice but can definitely be more work.
  • ej
    Participant
    Where Does the Rain Go? I most often work with homeschool or community groups in a fairly rural area. This was  a mixed age group that only met once/week, so the activities were demonstrated at the building & property where we meet but then students applied to their own houses & properties. This project was part of a larger interdisciplinary unit (geography, literature, science, nature studies) that includes mapping and watersheds using Holling C. Holling's Paddle-to-the -Sea as a literary tie in. The focus of this portion is on surface water flow with the 'Big Question' of “if a raindrop lands on your house, where will it end up?” We did this in the spring when we were likely to actually see surface water flowing ;) Week 1: we predict & map (and if raining actually observe) the flow of water that lands on the roof (which has some dormers, a lower porch, etc) to the ground. Students repeat for their own house. Week 2: same for where to the water from different sections of roof go once it hits the ground (puddle or flow elsewhere?) We follow potential paths for flowing water to the roadside ditch out front and the stream out back. Students repeat at home. HW includes paying attention on the drive home to where the ditch goes and whether they go over any bridges that might be the same stream as the one out back. Week 3: adventure day! We wade down the stream (over many fallen branches!) to the nearest bridge. We switch to actual road maps/satellite views to follow the stream to Cayuga Lake. Students repeat at home (to nearest lake or major river). Week 4: Using maps & atlases, we continue following the route of our raindrops from their local watershed to the Atlantic Ocean. Students compile their map series (rooftop, property, local watershed, Atlantic watershed). Classtime is structured inquiry: the Question is posed and a procedure outlined. The HW can fall between structured and guided inquiry. Some students just copy the procedures as we did in class, others amend or add other procedures – many start exploring (literally & with maps) on their own before we do in class. And there have been creative experiments with pingpong balls thrown/water hosed onto roofs/into ditches etc to confirm flow predictions if rain is scarce... Scientific practices: Asking questions & defining problems, developing & using models (maps), planning and carrying out investigations, analyzing and interpreting observational data, constructing explanations and communicating information (maps)
  • ej
    Participant
    I've done something similar before but more exploratory. Yours has several aspects that take it up a notch which I may incorporate if timing allows - especially using stations. I often work in small groups so we just gather round and share utensils and food and have an open discussion on what "beaks" work for which "foods" but the stations would allow for actual data collection. The photos of real foods the birds eat is a nice touch too! Thanks for sharing. ej
Viewing 11 posts - 1 through 11 (of 11 total)